Ok, so I’ve been testing certain codecs. Which does which with the same footage, and a few things I will not go under (mpg blurs, avi is lossless but no one wants to watch a 4 gig file.) So in the running contestant I decided to test H.264 to the quality I’ve been using so far. wmv.
Certain things I noticed, ACV(h.264) distorts during fairly fast scenes/transitions. Solid text and color is better than wmv, the edges were sharp and transitions were better.
With wmv the quality kept the same, no flux no distortion. But to a bright eye you can see that the solid/text scenes weren’t as clear.
From the pictures above AVC has a sharper look to it, while wmv has a slight blur.
The file size for AVC is almost halved compared to wmv. I would stick to wmv because AVC looks a tad funny under fast scenes. But I want some feedback, here’s the 2 video files and above is the comparison.
http://www.noobsgonewild.org/trickster/Quality%20Test.wmv (WMV)
http://www.noobsgonewild.org/trickster/Quality%20Test.mp4 (AVC, H.264)
4 years ago
•
0 notes